Which is best hosting among Bluehost vs. Hostinger in 2021? When it comes to selecting a hosting service provider, one of the most important considerations is pricing. You’d definitely want to save as much as possible on a hosting plan while still getting everything you need for your website. As a result, the hosting industry is booming with cheap hosting packages that try to squeeze in as many features and benefits as possible.
Two of the most popular options that offer something similar are Bluehost and Hostinger. If you are unable to select between these two hosting providers, this detailed Bluehost vs. Hosting post will help you make the decision. Both the web hosts will be compared on the basis of factors like pricing, user-friendliness, security, support, and more to help you pick the best.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger Hosting Comparison 2021
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: Pricing Comparison
The go-to option for the most new websites is shared hosting. It is cheap and generally has all the features that a website owner will need in the initial days of the website. While the price of shared hosting has already fallen considerably in the last few years, Hostinger reduced it further. The shared hosting plan from Hostinger costs just $0.80/month if paid annually.
There are other shared hosting plans like Premium Shared Hosting and Business Shared Hosting which costs $2.15/month and $3.45/month respectively. With the cheapest Single Shared Hosting plan, you get 1x processing power and memory, 100GB bandwidth, and 1 email account for a single website.
With the Premium Shared Hosting Plan, you get unlimited email accounts, unlimited bandwidth, weekly backups, and 2x processing power and memory for an unlimited number of websites. Moreover, the Premium and Business Shared Hosting plan also comes with a free domain.
Bluehost, on the other hand, proves to be a slightly expensive option. The cheapest shared hosting plan from Bluehost costs $2.95/month if paid annually. It includes 50GB SSD storage, unmetered bandwidth, free SSL certificate, and 1 domain name for a year.
The next shared hosting plan from Bluehost is Plus which costs $4.95/month if paid annually and includes unlimited SSD storage, unmetered bandwidth, SSL certificate, and unlimited domains for an unlimited number of websites.
So, if you want to select a web host just on the basis of pricing, Hostinger will prove to be a cheaper option as compared to Bluehost.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: Speed and Uptime
Both the hosting service providers have multiple data centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia to ensure that the website owners are able to select the nearest possible center for seamless data delivery and physical connectivity. While Hostinger had exceptional page load times around a year ago, it has fallen drastically in the past few months.
Multiple recent speed tests have confirmed that the page load time with Hostinger is in the range of 600 to 700ms. The same for Bluehost has remained fairly constant around 450ms. Even with regards to uptime, Bluehost seems to be a better option. While Hostinger had an uptime of 99.85% in the last 12 months, Bluehost was able to maintain the uptime at 99.99%.
So, while Hostinger might be a cheaper option, Bluehost leads with regards to speed and uptime.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: User-Friendliness
Unlike most top hosting providers, Hostinger does not offer cPanel for hosting management. It has its own custom control panel which most users agree is very easy to use. Even if this is the first time that you will be using hosting services, it shouldn’t be difficult for you to use the control panel. Bluehost offers cPanel which again is known to be user-friendly and has advanced features for professionals.
Hostinger also has its own drag-n-drop website builder which can be used for building a website from scratch. Bluehost offers a Weebly-powered website builder with pre-built templates for enhanced convenience.
With regards to user-friendliness, both the hosting providers offer almost the same level of convenience to make sure that even beginners are able to easily use their services.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: Security
The cheap hosting fee of Hostinger in a way means that you will not get anything more than the basics. This is especially true with regards to security. The baseline security features you get with Hostinger include free SSL certificate (only for Premium and Business plans), CloudFlare integration, and SpamAssassin integration. While there are other security tools such as the BitNinja package, they are mostly paid tools.
As one of the leading hosting providers, Bluehost lays a major emphasis on security. All the servers of Bluehost have received Tier 3 certification for improved uptime, redundancy, and safety. It offers free SSL certificate even with its cheapest shared hosting plan. It also offers free daily backup with some plans and there is an add-on named Site Backup Pro for on-demand backup. Moreover, there is also a 3rd party security tool named SiteLock which you can purchase for $30/year to considerably improve the security of your website.
Overall, while both the hosting providers offer basic security features with the shared hosting plan, the plans from Bluehost seem to be better equipped. Even the SiteLock tool is quite affordable and SSL certificate is included even in the cheapest plan.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: Scalability
You will also want your hosting service to scale with you as your website grows. For this, it is very important for your hosting service provider to offer many different types of hosting services. Bluehost excels in this aspect as well as it offers one of the widest range of services and every type of service has multiple plans to choose from.
For instance, it offers Shared Hosting, WordPress Hosting, VPS Hosting, and even Dedicated Hosting. This will allow you to select a hosting service as per the growing needs of your website. The hosting services of Hostinger are somewhat limited as it only offers Shared Hosting, Cloud Hosting, and VPS Hosting.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: WordPress
Increasing number of people now consider WordPress for building their website. As a result, it is important for the hosting provider to offer hosting service that is customized for the CMS platform. Hostinger does not offer hosting services that are exclusive to the WordPress platform.
Bluehost on the other hand not only offers WordPress hosting but has many different plans to make the selection easier. The basic WordPress hosting plan starts at $2.95/month and includes free domain for a year, 50GB SSD storage, and free SSL certificate for a single website. There is also a WP Pro plan that costs $19.95/month which comes with improved speed, all-in-one dashboard and marketing center, and various tools for social media, SEO, and email marketing.
Bluehost vs. Hostinger: Customer Support
Bluehost claims to have employed WordPress professionals and website developers in its support team. If user reviews are to be believed, Bluehost has one of the most knowledgeable support team which is able to resolve the most complex of queries in the least amount of time. You can get in touch with the support team through live chat, online ticket, social media, and phone.
To get in touch with the support department of Hostinger, you first need to login to your Hostinger account. Many users have mentioned that this is somewhat strange as only users who are logged in can communicate with the support team live. Apart from this chat feature, it also has a ticketing system. Additionally, it also has knowledgebase, video tutorials, and more on its website to help the customers.
Conclusion: Which is best hosting among Bluehost vs. Hostinger in 2021?
While there is no denying that Hostinger is cheaper than Bluehost, the latter is a better option if you are looking for a quality web host. If you are actually serious about your website and its growth, Bluehost seems to the go-to option between the two.
Bluehost has been around for a very long time and its services have only improved with time. So, if you are confused between Bluehost and Hostinger, Bluehost is definitely a better choice.